<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Zooom Digital Cameras &#187; Nikkor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zooomdigital.com/category/nikkor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zooomdigital.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nikkor AF-s 12-24mm Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://zooomdigital.com/2007/07/10/nikon/nikkor-af-s-12-24mm-reviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://zooomdigital.com/2007/07/10/nikon/nikkor-af-s-12-24mm-reviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rocky B.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zooomdigital.com/2007/07/10/nikon/nikkor-af-s-12-24mm-reviewed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://zooomdigital.com/2007/07/10/nikon/nikkor-af-s-12-24mm-reviewed/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="300" src="http://zooomdigital.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/41tyqeeqw7l_ss500_.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="Nikkor AF-s 12-24mm Reviewed" title="" /></a>A wide-angle lens is an indispensable piece of equipment for a wide range of photographers. Those using the Nikon system should consider picking up the Nikkor AF-s 12-24 (18-36 35mm equivalent). Photozone recently reviewed the lens stating, “The Nikkor AF-S 12-24mm f/4G IF-ED DX proved to be a very good performer. Its center resolution figures [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href='http://zooomdigital.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/41tyqeeqw7l_ss500_.jpg' title='Nikkor AF-s 12-24mm Reviewed'><img src='http://zooomdigital.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/41tyqeeqw7l_ss500_.jpg' alt='Nikkor AF-s 12-24mm Reviewed' /></a><br />
A wide-angle lens is an indispensable piece of equipment for a wide range of photographers.  Those using the Nikon system should consider picking up the Nikkor AF-s 12-24 (18-36 35mm equivalent).  <a href="http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/nikkor_1224_4/index.htm" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.photozone.de');">Photozone</a> recently reviewed the lens stating, </p>
<p>“The Nikkor AF-S 12-24mm f/4G IF-ED DX proved to be a very good performer. Its center resolution figures are exceptionally high and apart from 12mm @ f/4 the border quality is also impressive though a little less field curvature may be desirable at 12mm. CAs as well as the distortion characteristic are very good for an ultra-wide zoom lens whereas vignetting is about average due to the reduced APS-C image circle. The build quality is, in principal, very fine but you would usually expect a little more from a lens in this price class. The primary competitor is probably the Tokina AF 12-24mm f/4 AT-X Pro &#8211; a lens which is just as sharp but with a higher degree of CAs and worse flare in contra light &#8211; all at less than half the costs and combined with a better build quality. Costs aside it&#8217;s a close race between the two with a slight edge for the Nikkor regarding optical quality. When taking the very different price tags in account the decision may be a little more complicated.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zooomdigital.com/2007/07/10/nikon/nikkor-af-s-12-24mm-reviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
